|
ACTION
PLANNING TEMPLATE (Revised Draft)
|
||||
|
GOAL:
|
To measure the degree to which the staff at WVHS has
implemented Step Up to Writing strategies in their daily curriculum
To discover and ameliorate obstacles to SUTW
implementation
To measure the impact the implementation of Step Up to
Writing has had on writing scores of students at WVHS on the high school exit
exam and the the CSTs?
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Action
Step(s)
|
Person(s)
Responsible
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1.
Gather research articles and literature on writing across the curriculum
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug/Sept 2012
|
internet access,
professional education journals
|
Natalie Ruddell, district writing
coach
|
|
2.
Create teacher survey on SUTW implementation for 2011-2012 school year
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 8, 2012
|
Microsoft Word
|
Principal
English Chair
|
|
3.
Meet with supervisor to get permission
for teacher surveys
|
Principal
|
Aug 10, 2012
|
Copy of action research plan,
teacher survey
|
Principal
|
|
4.
Conduct survey of teachers
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 21, 2012
|
Teacher surveys
|
NA
|
|
5.
Invite 9th grade English teachers to gather writing samples of freshman
class
|
Ninth grade English Teachers
|
Aug 28, 2012
|
Write requests to English
department
|
English Chair
|
|
6.
Get writing samples from English department
|
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 11, 2012
|
Folders for storing samples
|
English Chair
|
|
7.
Analyze teacher survey data
|
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 2012
|
Microsoft Word and Microsoft
Excel, surveys
|
NA
|
|
8.
Review training of staff at site
|
SUTW Trainer
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 2012
|
SUTW training materials
|
NA
|
|
9.
Lead discussion of SUTW implementation
in leadership meeting
|
Department Chairs
|
Oct 2, 2012
|
Summary of surveys
|
NA
|
|
10.
Collect testing data from 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years
|
John Bradshaw
|
Oct 2012
|
Data Director
CAHSEE data
CST data
|
NA
|
|
11.
Facilitate staff development on ways to use SUTW and how to grade it
|
John Bradshaw
SUTW trainer
|
Nov 2012
|
SUTW rubrics
List of writing prompts/ ideas
|
Principal
|
|
12.
Collect evidence of SUTW implementation
|
Department Chairs
|
Nov/ Dec 2012
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
13.
Survey staff again on implementation of SUTW in 2012-2013 school year
|
John Bradshaw
|
May 21, 2013
|
Microsoft Word
|
Principal
|
|
14.
Write report of findings
|
John Bradshaw
|
Summer 2013
|
Microsoft Word, survey results,
professional readings, testing data
|
Principal
English Chair
|
|
15.
Make recommendations to leadership team
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 2013
|
PowerPoint, report, summary of
report, data
|
Feedback from Leadership Team
|
|
16.
Collect data from 2012-2013 school year
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 2013
|
Data Director
|
Compare data with previous years
|
|
17.
Present findings to staff
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 2013
|
PowerPoint
|
Principal
Leadership Team
|
Followers
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Week 4 Reflections
A few minor changes after talking to my principal. It's starting to feel real rather than just theory. That both excites and terrifies me. One more week until school starts!!
Strategies for Sustaining Improvement
My school adopted a PLC model a couple of years ago. We have been trying to really honor the
process with norms and in creating a more open dialogue between staff and
administration. My action research is on
writing and I am pleased to see that my principal either has great innate
leadership skills or has heard of force field theory. We encouraged teachers to share their
apprehensions before implementing the writing curriculum and have included
training and retraining to aid in the transition. Throughout our staff
development meetings we have included time for listing and addressing
concerns. At the beginning of the
following meeting we have summarized our findings from the previous meeting
before proceeding with the content of the next staff development. It sure feels good to think one did it the
right way. Planning trumps luck every
time.
I really like the Delphi
method. Too often teachers are asked to
answer a questionnaire and then that’s it.
There is no closure. No one knows
what happened to the information, why it was gathered. This has happened too many times at my campus
and is taking a concerted effort to rebuild trust in the system so that
teachers are willing and hopefully someday eager to share their thoughts. The Delphi
method is a great way to include many voices in decision making without long
and frequent meetings. I want to go and
try this with my staff right now. This
would be really good for identifying critical academic needs or for narrowing
down possible approaches to school policies.
Nominal Group Technique sounds very similar to a PLC
technique called Ordered Sharing. I like
that it allows everyone in the group a chance to voice their opinion without
any one person taking over the conversation.
I like that it is in a group but also seems to protect some anonymity
allowing for genuine opinions to be shared.
This would be good for having the staff discuss concerns and obstacles
to using a writing curriculum and in suggesting ways to implement it into their
classrooms.
Saturday, August 4, 2012
EDLD 5301 Week 3 Reflections
Finally got my action plan written out on paper. It seemed so straightforward until I wrote it out and realized there were a few more steps than I had originally thought. I also relearned the importance of having a new set of eyes to review it.
The English chair at my school suggested a major improvement. Originally, I had thought to just look at test data and the changes in writing convention scores on the standardized tests. Then I decided to survey the teachers and see how (or if) they are implementing the writing curriculum that is supposed to be schoolwide. The English chair suggested that I ask the ninth grade teachers for writing samples from the beginning of the year so that we can compare them to end-of-the-year writing samples to look for improvement. I think that will exponentially improve this study.
Since writing in all classrooms is a critical academic need at my school this will be a major boost for our self-study and for our accreditation process in the Spring.
The English chair at my school suggested a major improvement. Originally, I had thought to just look at test data and the changes in writing convention scores on the standardized tests. Then I decided to survey the teachers and see how (or if) they are implementing the writing curriculum that is supposed to be schoolwide. The English chair suggested that I ask the ninth grade teachers for writing samples from the beginning of the year so that we can compare them to end-of-the-year writing samples to look for improvement. I think that will exponentially improve this study.
Since writing in all classrooms is a critical academic need at my school this will be a major boost for our self-study and for our accreditation process in the Spring.
|
ACTION
PLANNING TEMPLATE (Revised Draft)
|
||||
|
GOAL:
|
To measure the degree to which the staff at WVHS has
implemented Step Up to Writing strategies in their daily curriculum
To discover and ameliorate obstacles to SUTW
implementation
To measure the impact the implementation of Step Up to
Writing has had on writing scores of students at WVHS on the high school exit
exam and the the CSTs?
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Action
Step(s)
|
Person(s)
Responsible
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1.
Gather research articles and literature on writing across the curriculum
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug/Sept 2012
|
internet access,
professional education journals
|
Natalie Ruddell, district writing
coach
|
|
2.
Create teacher survey on SUTW implementation for 2011-2012 school year
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 8, 2012
|
Microsoft Word
|
Principal
English Chair
|
|
3.
Meet with supervisor to get permission
for teacher surveys
|
Principal
|
Aug 10, 2012
|
Copy of action research plan,
teacher survey
|
Principal
|
|
4.
Conduct survey of teachers
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 21, 2012
|
Teacher surveys
|
NA
|
|
5.
Invite 9th grade English teachers to gather writing samples of freshman
class
|
Ninth grade English Teachers
|
Aug 28, 2012
|
Write requests to English
department
|
English Chair
|
|
6.
Get writing samples from English department
|
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 11, 2012
|
Folders for storing samples
|
English Chair
|
|
7.
Analyze teacher survey data
|
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 2012
|
Microsoft Word and Microsoft
Excel, surveys
|
NA
|
|
8.
Review training of staff at site
|
SUTW Trainer
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 2012
|
SUTW training materials
|
NA
|
|
9.
Lead discussion of SUTW implementation
in leadership meeting
|
Department Chairs
|
Oct 2, 2012
|
Summary of surveys
|
NA
|
|
10.
Collect evidence of SUTW implementation
|
Department Chairs
|
Nov/ Dec 2012
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
11.
Collect testing data from 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years
|
John Bradshaw
|
Sept 2012
|
Data Director
CAHSEE data
CST data
|
NA
|
|
12.
Facilitate staff development on ways to use SUTW and how to grade it
|
John Bradshaw
SUTW trainer
|
Nov 2012
|
SUTW rubrics
List of writing prompts/ ideas
|
Principal
|
|
13.
Survey staff again on implementation of SUTW in 2012-2013 school year
|
John Bradshaw
|
May 21, 2013
|
Microsoft Word
|
Principal
|
|
14.
Write report of findings
|
John Bradshaw
|
Summer 2013
|
Microsoft Word, survey results,
professional readings, testing data
|
Principal
English Chair
|
|
15.
Make recommendations to leadership team
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 2013
|
PowerPoint, report, summary of
report, data
|
Feedback from Leadership Team
|
|
16.
Collect data from 2012-2013 school year
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 2013
|
Data Director
|
Compare data with previous years
|
|
17.
Present findings to staff
|
John Bradshaw
|
Aug 2013
|
PowerPoint
|
Principal
Leadership Team
|
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)